Edgen AI operates independently of, and is not controlled by Aspen Digital Financial Limited.
WAICA launches with 20% acceptance rate as China builds rival AI platform
Edgen Stock·Jul 18 2026, 02:07Share to
Share to
Copy link
[1] The First World Artificial Intelligence Conference·Academic Officially Debuts (https://wallstreetcn.com/livenews/3135948 ...)[2] From Shanghai to Global Stage: WAICA Redefines Top-Tier Conference Standards with Groundbreaking "AI-Native" Paradigm (https://eu.36kr.com/en/p/3897977781946249 ...)[3] China Launches Rival AI Governance Bloc as WAIC 2026 Opens With 300 Product Debuts (https://www.techtimes.com/articles/320812/202 ...)[4] Xi tells World AI Conference no single country should monopolise AI (https://thenextweb.com/news/xi-jinping-waic-2 ...)
Related News
Jul 18 2026, 02:27
China's 18 fund managers seek approval for active stock ETFs
China's fund industry is on the cusp of its biggest product innovation in five years as 18 managers apply to launch actively managed stock ETFs. China's fund industry is set to blur the line between active and passive investing after 18 asset managers submitted applications July 17 for the first batch of actively managed stock ETFs, a product structure that combines daily portfolio transparency with zero subscription fees. "Active ETFs represent the most significant structural innovation in China's fund industry since the launch of index ETFs," said a fund industry executive familiar with the product design, speaking on condition of anonymity because the applications are under regulatory review. The 18 applications, evenly split between the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, include filings from E Fund, China Asset Management, Fullgoal, Harvest, Southern, Penghua, ICBC Credit Suisse and 11 other managers. Nine products target value, balanced or dividend strategies, while two — Yongying's Jingqi Strategy and E Fund's Quality Future — lean toward growth. All received "material received" status from the China Securities Regulatory Commission on the same day. The product's success could redirect billions of yuan in retail fund flows from traditional over-the-counter mutual funds to exchange-listed products, reshaping a multi-trillion-yuan industry. Under the new framework, managers must disclose their full portfolio daily before market open and publish intraday net asset values, a transparency requirement that marks a sharp departure from the quarterly disclosure typical of conventional active funds. The innovation addresses two long-standing pain points for Chinese retail investors. First, top-performing active funds frequently close to new subscriptions after strong runs, locking out latecomers. Active ETFs, by trading on exchanges, remain accessible regardless of subscription status. Second, the exchange-traded structure eliminates subscription and redemption fees — which can reach 1.5% for traditional funds — replacing them with brokerage commissions typically around 0.06%. **A Test of Manager Discipline** The daily disclosure requirement introduces a new challenge for fund managers accustomed to operating behind opaque portfolio walls. High-turnover strategies, common among China's active managers, could generate elevated trading costs and create arbitrage opportunities for sophisticated market participants monitoring the published holdings. "The success of active ETFs will depend on whether managers can adapt their investment processes to a daily-disclosure environment," said the executive. "Those with low-to-moderate turnover and clear style discipline are best positioned." The CSRC's approval timeline remains undisclosed, but industry participants expect the first products to reach the market within three to six months, pending the standard inquiry-and-response review process. The launch would follow similar product expansions in the U.S., where active ETFs have captured more than $500 billion in assets under management, according to Morningstar data. For China's fund industry, the stakes are high. Total ETF assets under management have grown rapidly but the pace of inflows has decelerated in recent quarters. Active ETFs offer a potential driver to rekindle investor interest — provided the products deliver on their promise of manager skill combined with ETF efficiency. *This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.*
Jul 18 2026, 02:08
BitGo investors have until Aug 7 to lead securities class action
BitGo Holdings faces a securities class action alleging its January IPO documents misled investors about the risk of falling crypto prices. "The IPO documents understated the scope and severity of the risk that declining digital asset prices posed to BitGo's business," the complaint filed by Pomerantz LLP said. BitGo sold 11.8 million shares at $18 each in its Jan 22 IPO, raising $187.6 million. On March 26, the company reported a net loss of $14.8 million for 2025, reversing a $156.6 million profit in 2024. The stock fell 15.7 percent to $7.67. On May 13, BitGo posted a $60.7 million net loss for the first quarter, and shares dropped another 17.2 percent. The lawsuit covers investors who bought BitGo shares in the IPO or between Jan 22, 2025 and May 13, 2026. Investors have until Aug 7 to seek lead plaintiff status. The stock closed at $9.86 on May 14, 45 percent below the $18 IPO price. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. BitGo operates as a digital asset infrastructure platform offering custody, trading and staking services, with revenue tied to crypto market conditions. The company reports revenue in two main segments: Digital Asset Sales, derived from trading volume, and Staking, which generates rewards from blockchain protocols. BitGo's March 26 earnings call revealed a quarterly margin of 0.21 percent in Digital Asset Sales, down from 0.47 percent a year earlier. The company attributed the decline to a challenging macroeconomic environment and declining digital asset prices. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under docket 26-cv-03428. Rosen Law Firm also reminded investors of the Aug 7 lead plaintiff deadline in a separate notice. BitGo, which trades on the New York Stock Exchange under ticker BTGO, went public as one of the first crypto custody firms to list via a traditional IPO. The complaint specifically alleges that the registration statement and prospectus filed with the SEC contained untrue statements of material fact and failed to disclose information required by securities regulations. The Offering Documents were negligently prepared and not in accordance with governing rules, the lawsuit claims. BitGo's financial performance is closely tied to digital asset prices, which have experienced significant volatility since the company's IPO. The company's Bitcoin treasury and trading revenue both face direct exposure to market downturns, a risk the lawsuit says was not adequately disclosed to investors. The lawsuit adds legal overhang to a stock trading well below its IPO price. BitGo's next quarterly report, due in August, will test whether the company can stabilize revenue as digital asset markets remain volatile. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Jul 18 2026, 01:08
StubHub drops 13% as D.C. ticket resale cap threatens revenue
**StubHub shares lost 13% this week after Washington D.C. capped secondary-ticket markups at 10%, the latest in a wave of North American resale restrictions that analysts say could cut the company's revenue by 30%.** A 10% cap on ticket resale markups in the nation's capital threatens to erode StubHub's core business model, with Citigroup estimating the company could lose nearly $100 million in EBITDA if similar measures spread. "The D.C. law joins a growing list of jurisdictions that have imposed legal caps on ticket resales, and if those caps average 15% for StubHub, its revenue could take a hit of around 30%," said Jason Bazinet, an analyst at Citigroup. The RESALE Act — short for "restricting egregious scalping against live entertainment" — passed the D.C. City Council on Tuesday and takes effect Jan. 1, 2027. StubHub shares fell 13% for the week ending July 17, according to data compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence. The broader S&P 500 dropped 1.1% over the same period. If 20% of StubHub's ticket sales become subject to legally mandated caps, its EBITDA could slide by about $95 million, Bazinet calculated. With similar legislation already introduced in New York, Massachusetts, California and North Carolina, the company faces an expanding regulatory patchwork that could force a fundamental shift in how it prices secondary-market tickets. **Ontario's experience offers a preview** Ontario's price cap, which took effect in April 2026, already shows how such policies play out in practice. The law caps resale prices at face value plus taxes and fees — a stricter standard than D.C.'s 10% markup limit. Season ticket-holders for the Toronto Raptors and Toronto Tempo have reported difficulty recovering costs for games they cannot attend, with some considering giving up their seats entirely. FIFA removed resale tickets for Toronto's World Cup matches from its official marketplace after the province enacted the cap, while resale remained available in other host cities. The disruption highlights a broader concern: price caps may push secondary-market activity into unregulated channels where consumer protections are weaker. **California and New York weigh similar curbs** California's Assembly Bill 1720 would cap resale markups at 10% above the original price, inclusive of fees. New York lawmakers have also considered reforms targeting concert ticket resale prices. Both measures are backed by Live Nation, which owns Ticketmaster, creating an unusual dynamic where the dominant primary-ticketing platform supports restrictions on its secondary-market competitors. For StubHub, the stakes are clear. The company relies on markups for profitability, and each new jurisdiction that adopts a cap reduces the addressable market for its core service. If all five states currently considering legislation follow through, the company could face revenue constraints across some of the largest entertainment markets in North America. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.