KOSPI surges 5% in sharpest rebound since June as chip stocks rally

source:

[1] 韩国首尔综指上涨5% (https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3777614 ...)[2] Global Markets: Asian Tech Recovers as Oil Cools (https://www.stl.news/global-markets-asian-tec ...)[3] KOSPI Jumps 3.56%, Triggers Trading Halt as Samsung and SK Hynix Lead Sharp Chip Rebound Rally Today (https://www.ibtimes.com.au/kospi-index-surges ...)[4] KOSPI Surges Over 4%, Triggering Buy-Side Sidecar for First Time in Months (https://bitcoinworld.co.in/kospi-buy-side-sid ...)[5] Tech Stocks Tumble, Oil Spikes Past $90 Amid Market Rout (https://www.stl.news/tech-stocks-tumble-oil-s ...)

Related News

Jul 22 2026, 01:07

Barclays sees 30% to 60% commodity price swings from super El Niño

Barclays expects the strongest El Niño on record in 2026 to trigger a multi-phase commodity trade spanning energy, tropical agriculture and metals. Palm oil, coconut oil and natural rubber prices may rise 30% to 60% within 18 months if the 2026 El Niño event matches forecasts as the strongest on record, while oil and gas prices face headwinds from an expected warm Northern Hemisphere winter, according to a Barclays cross-asset research report published July 21. "The sequential nature of El Niño's impact — energy first, tropical agriculture second, metals last — creates a phased trading calendar for commodity investors," the Barclays commodities research team wrote in the report. The report divides commodity responses into three tiers. Energy prices react fastest but in the opposite direction: European natural gas prices historically trade 9% to 28% below trend during El Niño events as warm winter conditions cut heating demand, while crude oil trades 5% to 30% below trend. Tropical agricultural commodities show the strongest upside, with palm oil prices rising about 26% in the 12 months after a strong El Niño and nearly 40% after 18 months, based on historical analysis. Coconut oil prices have gained 33% in the 18 months following strong events, with extreme events producing 50% to 60% gains. Natural rubber (RSS3) prices rise 15% to 20% after strong El Niño episodes, the report said. The 2026 event carries outsized risk because the El Niño index may reach +3 to +4, exceeding the 2015-16 peak of +2.8 that drove a 16% drop in US heating degree days and triggered 300,000 tonnes of aluminum capacity cuts in China's Yunnan province. A repeat of the 20% production cut scenario would put about 1.3 million tonnes of aluminum at risk, equivalent to 1.7% of global supply, with price effects typically materializing one to two years after the event. **Palm Oil Leads Tropical Agriculture Exposure** Indonesia and Malaysia account for nearly 90% of global palm oil supply, making the crop the highest-conviction El Niño trade in Barclays' framework. The Malaysian Palm Oil Board estimates an average El Niño reduces output by about 3% and inventories by 2.5%, pushing prices roughly 10% higher. For the current forecast event, the report notes that palm oil prices tend to trade below trend during the El Niño itself, meaning the early phase represents an entry window rather than the peak return period. Coconut oil production is concentrated in the Philippines and Indonesia. The US Department of Agriculture estimated the 2024 El Niño cut Philippine coconut oil output by nearly 12%. Natural rubber faces similar supply pressure: Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam — which together account for the majority of global supply — saw output fall about 10% and 15% respectively during the 2023-24 El Niño, as heat and drought reduced latex flow and shortened the tapping season. **Aluminum and Copper Face Lagged Supply Risks** Aluminum carries the clearest signal among industrial metals because of China's Yunnan province, which hosts about 660 million tonnes per year of primary aluminum capacity — roughly 9% of global output. The province relies on hydropower for 60% to 70% of its electricity, and El Niño systematically weakens the Bay of Bengal summer monsoon, reducing reservoir levels. The 2023-24 drought forced about 1.15 million tonnes of capacity cuts. A similar 20% reduction in the current cycle would put 1.3 million tonnes at risk. Copper's exposure is more ambiguous. Chile's northern regions — Atacama, Antofagasta and Tarapaca — concentrate about 420 million tonnes per year of copper capacity, or 17% of global supply, and were hit by severe flooding during the 2015 El Niño. However, Barclays found the statistical relationship between copper prices and El Niño to be weak, with macroeconomic conditions, Chinese demand and energy-transition investment exerting far greater influence on the red metal. The report cautioned that historical price patterns reflect statistical regularities rather than predictions, and that individual events can diverge significantly depending on macro conditions, supply-demand fundamentals and geopolitical factors. It also noted that La Niña — the cooling phase that often follows strong El Niño events — has historically produced clearer commodity price signals than El Niño itself, particularly for sugar and energy markets. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

Jul 22 2026, 00:48

Gold nears oversold after 22% decline from February peak

**Gold's 22% slide since late February has pushed the metal to a technical crossroads, with weekly RSI approaching oversold territory and a tightening wedge pattern that could trigger a sharp reversal if resistance breaks.** Gold fell to around $4,100 an ounce in March, down from a February peak above $5,600, as the market repriced expectations for Federal Reserve policy and reduced geopolitical risk premiums. The weekly relative strength index has dropped to levels that historically preceded major bottoms, according to chart analysis. "The best periods for gold performance have historically coincided with declining real interest rates, and the current Fed policy path remains highly uncertain," Giovanni Staunono, commodity strategist at UBS Chief Investment Office, said. The daily chart shows a bullish RSI divergence — prices making lower lows while momentum indicators printed higher lows — a pattern that often precedes trend reversals. Gold is currently trapped between a long-term ascending support line and a descending resistance trendline that has capped rallies since early March. This wedge pattern is narrowing, and the breakout direction will be decisive. The options market reinforces the setup. Gold options are trading with a negative skew, meaning puts — bets on further declines — cost more than calls. That is unusual for gold, which typically exhibits positive skew due to its safe-haven appeal. The current structure suggests investors are crowded into downside protection, a condition that historically has preceded short squeezes. **Wedge Pattern Tightens as RSI Flashes Oversold** The converging trendlines on gold's daily chart leave little room for continued consolidation. The descending resistance line, drawn from the March highs, currently intersects with the long-term support trendline near $4,000 to $4,200. A break above resistance would target the $4,800 area, while a breakdown below support could accelerate losses toward $3,800. The weekly RSI has fallen to its lowest since late 2024, approaching the 30 threshold that marks oversold conditions. In previous instances when gold's weekly RSI entered this zone — including the 2018 and 2022 corrections — the metal staged double-digit rebounds within three months. **Fed Path Uncertainty Creates Two-Way Risk** The macro backdrop remains the dominant variable. Markets are pricing roughly a 50 percent probability of a rate hike before September, according to CME data, as the Fed weighs the inflationary impact of higher energy costs against slowing growth. New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has resisted providing forward guidance, limiting his public remarks to general statements about price stability. He has convened working groups to study inflation drivers and artificial intelligence's effect on productivity, with reports not expected until late in the year. Two scenarios could shift the outlook in gold's favor: if the Fed moves slowly in responding to oil-driven inflation, allowing broader price pressures to build; or if a cooling AI investment boom forces monetary easing while energy prices stay elevated due to geopolitical factors. Both would push real rates lower, a historically bullish signal for gold. **Equity Optimism Underscores Gold's Hedge Appeal** Equity markets have remained resilient through the recent geopolitical turmoil, with investors focused on AI-driven growth prospects and paying limited attention to tail risks. That divergence — elevated stock valuations alongside elevated uncertainty — strengthens the case for holding gold as a portfolio hedge, according to UBS's Staunono. "The cost of gold is that it generates no yield, but during periods of concentrated uncertainty, maintaining some allocation as insurance against unforeseen risks makes portfolio sense," he said. Positioning data supports the contrarian case. Speculative long positions in COMEX gold futures have fallen to multi-year lows, while实物 demand from central banks and retail buyers in Asia has held steady. The combination of extreme bearish positioning, options skew favoring puts, and resilient physical demand creates the conditions for a potential squeeze higher. The immediate catalyst will be the breakout from the wedge pattern. A close above the descending resistance line would confirm the reversal, with the next major test at $4,800. Failure to break higher could see gold test the $3,800 to $4,000 zone, where long-term support from the 2024 uptrend converges with the 200-week moving average. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

Jul 22 2026, 00:46

GM pivots to big trucks and defense as Trump reshapes industry

**GM's strategic pivot under President Trump's second term — doubling down on big trucks while pushing into the defense industry — is already generating revenue gains, marking one of the most significant corporate realignments in the auto sector since the 2018 tariff cycle.** General Motors Co. is reshaping its business around two pillars that benefit directly from the current political environment: large pickup and SUV production, where trade policy has created a protective moat, and defense manufacturing, where Washington's push to quadruple production of "exquisite class" weapon systems is opening new revenue streams. The strategy, detailed in a July 21 report from the Wall Street Journal, reflects a calculation that the administration's second term will sustain both tariff protection for domestic truck production and elevated defense spending. "The alignment between GM's product mix and the administration's industrial policy is unusually direct," said Elena Fischer, a geopolitical risk analyst. "The company is positioning itself to capture both trade-protected margins in its core truck business and a share of the defense buildout that is unlike anything we've seen since the Reagan era." GM's heavy-truck and SUV lineup generates the bulk of its North American profit, with the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra franchises alone accounting for an estimated $12 billion to $14 billion in annual operating income, according to industry estimates. The Trump administration's 25% tariff on imported pickup trucks — a policy first imposed in 2018 and maintained through the second term — effectively shields GM's truck margins from foreign competition, allowing the Detroit automaker to sustain pricing power even as the broader auto market faces demand uncertainty. The defense push represents a more dramatic departure. GM has been expanding its military vehicle business, which includes the production of the Infantry Squad Vehicle and other platforms for the U.S. Army. The company is also exploring opportunities in missile components and advanced manufacturing for defense applications, according to people familiar with the matter. The Department of Defense's fiscal 2027 budget request, which exceeds $900 billion, includes significant increases for vehicle modernization programs that could benefit GM's defense unit. **Defense margins offer a higher ceiling** The economics of defense contracting differ sharply from automotive manufacturing. While GM's auto business operates on single-digit net margins, defense contracts typically carry margins of 8 percent to 12 percent, with longer production runs and government-backed demand. For a company that generated $187 billion in revenue in fiscal 2025, even a modest shift in revenue mix toward defense could meaningfully lift overall profitability. The last time a major U.S. automaker made a sustained push into defense was during the Cold War, when Ford produced the M151 military jeep and GM built armored vehicles. The current cycle is different in scale: the Pentagon's push to replenish stockpiles depleted by conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East has created multiyear procurement commitments that give contractors rare visibility into future revenue. GM's pivot also carries risks. The defense industry is capital-intensive, with long lead times between contract awards and revenue recognition. The company's $65 million investment in a new manufacturing facility in Oklahoma — announced in July 2026 — is partly aimed at supporting both commercial and defense production, but the upfront costs will weigh on free cash flow before the defense revenue materializes. The broader implication for the auto sector is that GM's strategy could force competitors to make similar choices. Ford Motor Co. has already signaled interest in expanding its defense business, while Stellantis NV faces the challenge of competing in the truck segment without the same tariff protection for its Mexican-built Ram pickups. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.