Coalition strikes Houthi targets as Red Sea blockade threatens 12% trade

source:

[1] Saudi-led coalition says it strikes military targets of Yemen's Houthi group (https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3777912 ...)[2] US military launches new strikes on Iran as clashes escalate over shipping routes (https://apnews.com/article/iran-us-hormuz-str ...)[3] US hits Iran as path towards de-escalation uncertain (https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/931732 ...)[4] Houthi Blockade On Saudi Red Sea Oil Transits Threatens To Widen War, Strangle Energy Supply (Updated) (https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/hou ...)[5] Saudi Arabia strikes Houthi-held Hodeidah, Yemeni group says (https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/sau ...)

Related News

Jul 24 2026, 23:12

Small businesses sue Trump over 12.5% Section 301 tariffs on 60 nations

Small businesses are suing to block Trump's new 10% to 12.5% tariffs on 60 economies, arguing the government illegally revived a strategy the Supreme Court already rejected. Two lawsuits contend the administration cannot use Section 301 to replicate tariffs invalidated in February. "Forced labor in global supply chains is morally unacceptable, but a worthy goal does not give the government license to ignore the law," said Sara Albrecht, chief executive officer of the Liberty Justice Center, which represents the plaintiffs. The group is seeking class-action status to represent all importers affected by the new duties. The plaintiffs — spice importer Burlap and Barrel Inc., watch retailer Collective Horology LLC, and educational toy makers Learning Resources Inc. and hand2mind Inc. — argue the US Trade Representative's investigation into forced labor relied on generalized claims about global supply chains rather than country-specific findings required under Section 301. The law typically demands the USTR identify specific foreign trade practices, demonstrate how they harm US commerce, and justify the tariff response. The administration's approach, the suits allege, amounts to "a wholesale effort to replicate the IEEPA tariff system that was declared unlawful." The legal battle carries significant financial stakes. The US government collected about $166 billion under the now-invalidated IEEPA tariffs and has already paid out tens of billions in refunds, though the Justice Department continues to fight the scope of those repayments. If the courts limit the administration's ability to use Section 301 for broad tariff actions, it could constrain Trump's trade policy options and force a rethinking of how the US addresses forced labor concerns in global supply chains. ## Section 301 Faces Legal Test on Scope of Authority The core legal question is whether Section 301 — a law designed to target specific unfair trade practices by named countries — can support tariffs applied across about 60 economies simultaneously. The plaintiffs argue the USTR's investigation never identified which countries engage in forced labor, how those practices harm specific US industries, or why across-the-board tariffs are the appropriate remedy. The Liberty Justice Center said the case could set a precedent determining the outer bounds of presidential trade authority under existing statutes. ## $166 Billion Refund Overhang From Prior Tariff Regime The new legal challenge also revives attention to the unresolved aftermath of the IEEPA tariffs. After the Supreme Court ruled those tariffs unlawful in February, US Customs faced a flood of refund claims from importers who had paid duties since the program began. The government has disbursed tens of billions in repayments, according to court filings, but the Justice Department is appealing a ruling that would require refunds for all importers rather than only those who participated in the lawsuit. A separate adverse ruling on the Section 301 tariffs could compound the fiscal exposure. The US Trade Representative's office has not commented on the litigation. The cases are Burlap and Barrel Inc. v. Greer and Learning Resources Inc. v. United States, both before the US Court of International Trade in New York. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

Jul 24 2026, 23:09

Navarro launches 3-pronged tariff rebuild after Supreme Court setback

**The White House is reconstructing its tariff program through multiple trade laws after the Supreme Court invalidated the previous approach, senior adviser Peter Navarro said.** The White House is rebuilding its tariff regime through at least three separate trade-law investigations after the Supreme Court struck down the prior program, senior adviser Peter Navarro said Thursday, opening new fronts on forced labor, EU technology policies and foreign industrial overcapacity. "These investigations give us the legal foundation to protect American workers and industries using statutes Congress has long provided," Navarro said in an interview. "The Supreme Court closed one door, but Congress left several others open." The new approach relies on trade laws targeting forced labor in global supply chains, Section 301 authorities addressing the European Union's treatment of US technology companies and separate probes into foreign industrial overcapacity. Specific tariff rates, affected trade volumes and effective dates have not yet been disclosed. The reconstruction effort threatens to escalate trade conflicts across multiple fronts simultaneously. New duties on EU tech companies could affect billions of dollars in transatlantic digital services trade, while overcapacity investigations may target sectors from steel to semiconductors — raising costs for multinational corporations and potentially reigniting inflation pressures. The Supreme Court's decision earlier this year invalidated the administration's previous tariff framework, which had relied on a broad interpretation of executive authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The ruling forced the White House to return to statutory trade laws that require formal investigations, public comment periods and specific findings of injury or unfair practices. The previous tariff regime had covered roughly $380 billion in annual US imports before the court struck it down, according to Census Bureau data. The forced-labor component targets supply chains where US Customs and Border Protection has identified potential violations. The administration is expected to issue withhold-release orders on specific products, though Navarro did not specify which goods or countries would be affected first. Similar forced-labor authorities have previously been applied to products from Xinjiang cotton to electronics components, affecting an estimated $5 billion in annual trade. **EU Tech Probe Targets Digital Services** The investigation into the European Union's treatment of US technology companies marks a significant escalation in transatlantic trade tensions. The EU has imposed digital services taxes on American firms including Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc.'s Google and Meta Platforms Inc., drawing threats of retaliatory tariffs from Washington for years. The Section 301 probe — the same statute used during the US-China trade war that imposed tariffs on $370 billion in Chinese goods — could lead to duties on European digital services, luxury goods or agricultural products. The US trade deficit in digital services with the EU stood at roughly $18 billion in 2025, according to Bureau of Economic Analysis data. **Overcapacity Investigations Broaden Scope** Separate probes into foreign industrial overcapacity could affect multiple sectors where global supply exceeds demand. The administration is examining whether state-subsidized production in countries such as China has depressed prices and harmed US manufacturers. Previous overcapacity actions have targeted steel and aluminum, where US tariffs of 25% have been in place since 2018, but the new investigations may extend to semiconductors, solar panels and electric vehicles. The previous US tariff on Chinese EVs added roughly $12,000 to the sticker price of a $48,000 vehicle, according to industry estimates. For investors, the multi-front tariff strategy introduces uncertainty across supply chains, corporate margins and inflation expectations. Companies with exposure to EU digital services, Asian manufacturing and cross-border supply chains face the highest risk of cost increases. The next milestone will be the publication of formal investigation findings, which will trigger specific tariff proposals and public comment periods. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

Jul 24 2026, 23:08

Compass CEO says housing market turning corner as data shows 4.6% premium

**Compass International Holdings data shows pre-marketed homes sold for 4.6% more than direct-to-MLS listings, as the brokerage's chief executive declared the US housing market is turning the corner.** Compass International Holdings Chief Executive Officer Robert Reffkin said the US housing market is "definitively" turning the corner, as new data from the brokerage showed its pre-marketed listings commanded a 4.6% price premium over homes listed directly on the multiple listing service. "The data is consistent: Giving homeowners marketing strategies to build interest in their home and refine the price before listing on the MLS and portals leads to a higher sale price," Compass Chief Data Officer Dave Crosby said in a statement. "It's real money." The 4.6% premium — up from 2.9% in a prior study covering 2024 data — was based on an analysis of more than 70,000 closed Compass transactions during the 12 months ending March 31. Pre-marketed homes also went under contract 34% faster and were 29% less likely to receive a price cut, the brokerage said. At the US median home price of $430,000, the premium equates to about $19,780. The findings bolster Compass's push for a phased marketing approach — Private Exclusive, Coming Soon, then MLS — as the brokerage competes for listings in a market where existing-home sales have been constrained by the mortgage rate lock-in effect. First American Deputy Chief Economist Odeta Kushi said in a separate report this month that the lock-in effect is "beginning to loosen," while Zillow data showed home sales jumped in June and mortgage costs fell below year-ago levels. The Compass study controlled for more than 50 confounding variables including property characteristics, agent attributes, seller demographics and neighborhood-level conditions. However, the analysis only covered transactions that closed during the period and did not account for listings that expired or were withdrawn, nor did it disclose price adjustments made during the pre-marketing phases. Compass also highlighted research by Dr. Darren Hayunga of the University of Georgia, who found that pocket listings in the Dallas-Fort Worth area between 2002 and 2022 sold for a 1.7% premium on average, with luxury properties commanding an 8.2% premium. That study compared homes listed on the MLS with those that had zero days on market and were only added after sale — a narrower definition than Compass's phased approach. **Broader Market Shows Signs of Thaw** Beyond Compass's proprietary data, multiple indicators point to a gradual recovery in housing activity. Redfin reported that the median luxury home sale price rose 4.7% year-over-year during the three months ending May 31 — more than triple the gain in non-luxury prices. Veros Real Estate Solutions described the market as "stuck, not sinking," while the National Federation of Independent Business reported that small business optimism rose 2.1 points in June and uncertainty declined. The improving sentiment comes as mortgage rates have eased from their 2025 peaks, though they remain elevated relative to pre-pandemic levels. The Mortgage Bankers Association's purchase index has shown modest improvement in recent weeks, suggesting buyers are gradually re-entering the market after a prolonged period of caution. **What the Premium Means for Sellers** For homeowners considering a sale, the Compass data suggests that patience in the pre-marketing phase can yield meaningful financial returns. The 4.6% premium on a $430,000 home translates to nearly $20,000 — a sum that more than covers typical closing costs and commission fees in many markets. The trade-off, however, is time: properties in the pre-marketing phases may take longer to reach a signed contract when counting the days spent as a Private Exclusive or Coming Soon listing, data that Compass did not disclose. Reffkin's bullish stance on Fox Business reflects a broader shift in tone among housing industry executives. After a year marked by affordability constraints and limited inventory, the combination of easing mortgage costs, rising consumer confidence and data showing pricing power for strategic sellers is beginning to reshape the narrative around the US housing market. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.